Guides

Our community voted on a color for the game's UI. Blue won. Here's why we ignored it and shipped green instead.

The vote was clear. Blue won by a lot.

We ran a poll on the idea board last month. The question was simple: what color should the UI accents be? The options were blue, green, orange, and purple. Blue took 58% of the votes. Green came in second with 22%. Orange and purple split the rest. The result felt decisive. We've never seen that much agreement in a community that argues about recoil patterns and respawn timers.

We got excited. Blue is a safe color. It reads as calm, professional, and familiar. Most shooters use blue for friendly UI elements. Players associate it with health, ammo, and objectives. We wanted to give the community what they asked for. So we put it together (avoid start per avoidList) implementing blue in the loadout screen, the scoreboard, and the HUD elements that sit on top of the action.

The build looked good in the bright menu scenes. We captured screenshots and shared them in the Discord. People liked what they saw. Then we took the build into our darkest map, the one we call Blackout, and something went wrong. The blue text and icons blended into the shadows. The health bar became hard to read at a glance. The objective marker disappeared against the dark walls.

The build looked good in the bright menu scenes. We captured screenshots and shared them in the Disc

We ran a contrast check and the numbers confirmed our eyes. Blue failed the WCAG contrast ratio on our dark map backgrounds. That means the color doesn't have enough difference from the background for the human eye to pick up quickly. In a game where split-second decisions decide fights, that's a death sentence. We had to make a choice.

Blue failed where it mattered most

We're not a big studio. We're a small team of students in Tunisia. We don't have a focus group or a UX department. We have the idea board, our own playtesting, and the thousands of matches you play every day. When we saw the contrast failure, we had to decide if we were going to ship something that looked nice in screenshots but played badly in the dark, or something that worked.

The contrast check is a simple formula that measures the difference between two colors. The higher the contrast ratio, the easier it is to distinguish text and icons from their background. Our blue, a specific hex code we picked, had a ratio of 2.5: 1 against the dark gray we use in Blackout. The green we tested, a shade close to what military HUDs use, hit 4.6. 1. That's the difference between squinting and reading.

We tested both colors in live matches. We put blue in one build and green in another. We played on Blackout, on our industrial map, and on the desert map. Blue vanished on the dark map. Green stayed visible everywhere. We also asked a few players from the community to join us in a test session. None of them knew what we were testing. They just played. Every single one of them said the green build was easier to track.

One player said they had to look directly at the blue health bar to see how low they were. With green, they could glance at it while aiming. That split-second difference matters. In a game where you die in under three seconds of sustained fire, losing half a second to read your own health can cost you the match.

Green wins because it helps you play better

We shipped the green UI yesterday. The patch notes say 'UI accent color changed to green for better visibility on dark maps.' We didn't mention the vote. We didn't explain the tradeoff yet. We wanted to see what you would say. The reaction was immediate. Some players asked if we forgot what they voted for. Others said green looks better than blue anyway. A few noticed the difference in readability and called it a smart move.

We get the frustration. You took time to vote. You expected to see blue in the next update. We're not ignoring your voice. We're prioritizing the reason you play the game in the first place: to win, to survive, to improve. A color that you can't see gets you killed. Green keeps you alive. That's the tradeoff we make every day, not just with colors but with every feature we add or cut.

This is also how we think about making money as an indie studio. We're not selling skins or game passes. The game is free, no install, no credit card. The two in-game currencies are earned by playing. So the only way we keep the servers running is if you keep playing. That means every decision has to make the game more fun to play, not just cooler to look at. A UI that hides your health isn't fun. It's annoying.

When you ask how indie game developers earn money, the boring answer is: make something people want to play, then don't mess it up with bad design. We earn our keep by making sure the smallest details don't get in the way of your fun. Green over blue is one of those details.

The same logic applies to how we earn money

People often ask us how indie game developers earn money, especially when the game is free and there are no microtransactions. The short answer: we don't have a short answer. We have a long game. We keep the game free so the barrier to entry is zero. No credit card, no download, just click and play. That gets more players in the door. More players means more people voting on the idea board, more testers, and more community members who spread the word.

Our two in-game currencies are earned by playing matches, completing missions, and surviving waves. You can't buy them. That might sound backwards for a studio that needs revenue. But it creates the exact kind of trust that makes a community stick. When you know we can't sell you an advantage, you trust the balance. When you trust the balance, you stay. And players who stay are the ones who support us in other ways.

We're honest about it: indie game development is not a reliable career right now. We're students. We have other plans. But we also see the potential. The idea board is our roadmap. When you upvote a feature, we build it. That means the game evolves exactly the way the community wants. And a game that evolves with its community is a game people talk about. That's our path to making indie game development profitable. It's not about this week or this month. It's about Building something that still has players five years from now.

If you want to know how profitable is indie game development, the real answer is: it depends on whether you treat players as customers or as partners. We choose partners. So the color vote matters, but not as much as the reason you're playing.

Your next vote will be on the weapon rebalance

We're going to put the weapon rebalance up for a vote next week. The top three ideas from the board are a sniper damage buff, a shotgun spread reduction, and a new SMG. We'll post the exact numbers we plan to change. You vote, we build. But we already know some of the proposals will fail their internal tests. That's fine. We'll tell you when that happens and show you the data.

The color vote taught us a lesson: sometimes the community picks something that doesn't work in practice. We still respect the choice. We tested it. We learned. We shipped what plays better. And we kept the door open for future votes. The system still works. It's just not a rubber stamp. We reserve the right to ignore the popular pick when it hurts your game experience.

A lot of people online ask is indie game development worth it. When you see a studio ignore a community vote, you might think we're out of touch. But the opposite is true. We're so in touch with the game's feel that we know blue fails. We're not chasing likes. We're chasing good matches. Green gives you that. Blue gave you a screenshot.

We're also working on a full transparency page where we'll post the contrast ratios and test notes for every UI element we ship. That way, next time we make a call, you can see the reasoning. You might still disagree. But you'll understand. We think that's a fair trade.

What we shipped and why it matters for you

The update is live now. Load up The Agency and check your loadout screen. The green is a bit more muted than what you might expect from a highlighter. It's a dark military green that sits comfortably against the shadows. The health bar pulses when you're low. The objective marker stays crisp even on the darkest corners of Blackout. We think you'll notice the difference within one match.

We also added a small note in the loading screen that says 'UI colors are tested for contrast on all maps. If you can't read it, we can't ship it.' That's a promise. It's also a joke among us because we know the color vote is still burning in some people's minds. But we'd rather have a joke than a broken HUD.

This is the kind of tradeoff we make every day. Sometimes we cut a feature because it's too buggy. Sometimes we ship something early because it works. And sometimes we ignore your vote because it would ruin the game. That last one is the hardest. But it's also what separates a game that respects your time from a game that just wants your clicks.

We still love you. We know you voted for blue because you thought it looked cool. And it does. But green is what keeps you alive. And alive players are the ones who get to vote again. So next time you see a green health bar, remember: that's your vote doing its job, even if it doesn't look like what you picked.

← All guides